United States v. Alexander, 3:18-CR-202-MOC. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190904887
Visitors: 230
Filed: Sep. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Pro Se filing, captioned as a "Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), concerning the Obstruction of Process of Courts, Doc. 50-53." (Doc. No. 54). The Court construes Defendant's filing a Motion to Reconsider the Court's prior Order denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and the Court hereby denies the motion to reconsider, as the Court has already thoroughly discussed Defendant's arguments regarding th
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Pro Se filing, captioned as a "Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), concerning the Obstruction of Process of Courts, Doc. 50-53." (Doc. No. 54). The Court construes Defendant's filing a Motion to Reconsider the Court's prior Order denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and the Court hereby denies the motion to reconsider, as the Court has already thoroughly discussed Defendant's arguments regarding the..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Pro Se filing, captioned as a "Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), concerning the Obstruction of Process of Courts, Doc. 50-53." (Doc. No. 54). The Court construes Defendant's filing a Motion to Reconsider the Court's prior Order denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and the Court hereby denies the motion to reconsider, as the Court has already thoroughly discussed Defendant's arguments regarding the search at issue in Defendant's prior motion to suppress.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
