U.S. v. LEEPER, 8:14CR228. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20141219b81
Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the unopposed defendant's motion to continue trial [65] due to a scheduling conflict. The court finds good cause being shown and the trial will be continued. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for January 6, 2015 is continued to March 10, 2015. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the unopposed defendant's motion to continue trial [65] due to a scheduling conflict. The court finds good cause being shown and the trial will be continued. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for January 6, 2015 is continued to March 10, 2015. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the unopposed defendant's motion to continue trial [65] due to a scheduling conflict. The court finds good cause being shown and the trial will be continued. The defendant has complied with NECrimR 12.1(a).
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for January 6, 2015 is continued to March 10, 2015.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and March 10, 2015, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
