GERING v. DEUTSCH, 7:13CV5009. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20141030c35
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant's Supplemental Expert Witness Disclosure and Proposed Expert Witnesses (Filing No. 40) and the defendant's Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order (Filing No. 45). The court held a telephone conference on October 29, 2014, with Amy L. Patras representing the plaintiffs and Erin C. Duggan Pemberton representing the defendant. After consultation with counsel, IT IS ORDERED: 1
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant's Supplemental Expert Witness Disclosure and Proposed Expert Witnesses (Filing No. 40) and the defendant's Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order (Filing No. 45). The court held a telephone conference on October 29, 2014, with Amy L. Patras representing the plaintiffs and Erin C. Duggan Pemberton representing the defendant. After consultation with counsel, IT IS ORDERED: 1...
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant's Supplemental Expert Witness Disclosure and Proposed Expert Witnesses (Filing No. 40) and the defendant's Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order (Filing No. 45). The court held a telephone conference on October 29, 2014, with Amy L. Patras representing the plaintiffs and Erin C. Duggan Pemberton representing the defendant. After consultation with counsel,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant's Supplemental Expert Witness Disclosure and Proposed Expert Witnesses (Filing No. 40) is denied.
2. The defendant's Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order (Filing No. 45) is granted as set forth herein.
3. The Order (Filing No. 36) is amended as follows:
a. The defendant shall have until November 17, 2014, to complete expert witness disclosures, except the defendant shall have until December 1, 2014, to have its expert, Dr. Mark Dietrich, conduct a medical examination of the plaintiff and complete expert disclosures.
b. The plaintiffs shall have until December 15, 2014, to complete rebuttal expert witness disclosures, except the plaintiff shall have until January 9, 2015, to complete rebuttal expert witness disclosures with regard to Dr. Dietrich's disclosures.
c. The parties shall have until January 12, 2015, to file motions in limine challenging the admissibility of expert witness testimony.
4. A telephone planning conference with the undersigned magistrate judge remains scheduled for January 15, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., for the purpose of reviewing the preparation of the case to date and the scheduling of the case to trial. The plaintiffs' counsel shall initiate the call.
Source: Leagle
