Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. WILDENRADT, 8:14CR54. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20140919a10 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion to continue the trial of this matter by the government (Filing No. 87). Upon consideration, the motion will be granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The motion to continue trial (Filing No. 87) is granted. 2. Trial of this matter as to all defendants is re-scheduled for November 10, 2014, before Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the i
More

ORDER

THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion to continue the trial of this matter by the government (Filing No. 87). Upon consideration, the motion will be granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The motion to continue trial (Filing No. 87) is granted.

2. Trial of this matter as to all defendants is re-scheduled for November 10, 2014, before Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between September 18, 2014, and November 10, 2014, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer