U.S. v. OCHOA, 09-299(01) (MJD/FLN). (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20150803668
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2015
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's pro se motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Defendant seeks a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines which lowered the drug quantity base offense levels applicable to certain drug offenses. The Defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction, however, as he was sentenced to the ten year mandatory minimum sentence required u
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's pro se motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Defendant seeks a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines which lowered the drug quantity base offense levels applicable to certain drug offenses. The Defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction, however, as he was sentenced to the ten year mandatory minimum sentence required un..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's pro se motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).
The Defendant seeks a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines which lowered the drug quantity base offense levels applicable to certain drug offenses. The Defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction, however, as he was sentenced to the ten year mandatory minimum sentence required under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) and Amendment 782 did not alter the applicable guideline range for cases involving a statutory minimum sentence.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motions for Sentence Reduction [Doc. No. 480] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
