NUNEZ v. HARPER, 2:13-cv-00392-GMN-NJK. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20141201608
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER (Docket Nos. 104, 105) NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. On November 21, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to seal protected records. Docket No. 101. The Court granted the motion, and the Clerk of the Court sealed the motions at Docket Nos. 54 and 59. Docket No. 102. The Court ordered Defendants to refile their motions with the appropriate redactions of confidential information, and those motions have now been refiled. Docket Nos. 104, 105. The Court already ruled on Defendants' motions a
Summary: ORDER (Docket Nos. 104, 105) NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. On November 21, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to seal protected records. Docket No. 101. The Court granted the motion, and the Clerk of the Court sealed the motions at Docket Nos. 54 and 59. Docket No. 102. The Court ordered Defendants to refile their motions with the appropriate redactions of confidential information, and those motions have now been refiled. Docket Nos. 104, 105. The Court already ruled on Defendants' motions at..
More
ORDER
(Docket Nos. 104, 105)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
On November 21, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to seal protected records. Docket No. 101. The Court granted the motion, and the Clerk of the Court sealed the motions at Docket Nos. 54 and 59. Docket No. 102. The Court ordered Defendants to refile their motions with the appropriate redactions of confidential information, and those motions have now been refiled. Docket Nos. 104, 105. The Court already ruled on Defendants' motions at Docket Nos. 54 and 59. See Docket Nos. 74, 76. Accordingly, Defendants' refiled motions (Docket Nos. 104, 105) are hereby DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
