Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ADEMILUYI v. PHILLIPS, 2:14-cv-00507-MMD-CWH. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20140714a77 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jul. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2014
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Protective Order (#71), filed July 8, 2014. On June 24, 2014, the Court held a hearing on several discovery motions. See Mins. of Proceedings (#65). During the hearing, the Court specifically instructed the parties to meet and confer to negotiate a stipulated protective order regarding certain information, including information requested from third-parties. The stipulated protective order w
More

ORDER

C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Protective Order (#71), filed July 8, 2014. On June 24, 2014, the Court held a hearing on several discovery motions. See Mins. of Proceedings (#65). During the hearing, the Court specifically instructed the parties to meet and confer to negotiate a stipulated protective order regarding certain information, including information requested from third-parties. The stipulated protective order was to be submitted by July 8, 2014. Instead, Defendant filed a motion for protective order, which included several email communications between the parties that appear to show an unwillingness by Plaintiff to meet and confer on the issues. Thus, in order to ferret out the issues raised in the proposed protective order the Court will conduct another hearing. All necessary parties or party representatives must attend the hearing in-person. No telephonic appearances will be permitted. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a hearing on Defendant's Motion for Protective Order (#71) will commence on August 5, 2014 at 2:30 PM in Las Vegas Courtroom 3C. ALL PARTIES OR PARTY REPRESENTATIVES MUST APPEAR IN PERSON.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all records obtained from third-parties as a result of any Rule 45 subpoena shall be quarantined by the parties and shall not be used in any way by any party or party representative until after completion of the August 5, 2014 hearing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ORDER SHALL RESULT IN AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS, UP TO AND INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE LAWSUIT, SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer