Calvin Louis Missouri v. Domino, 3:18CV65TSL-RHW. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20190117i16
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER TOM S. LEE , District Judge . This cause came on this date to be heard upon the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker, and the court, having fully reviewed the report and recommendation entered in this cause on November 15, 2018, and being duly advised in the premises and there being no objection 1 filed by plaintiff, finds that said report and recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the rep
Summary: ORDER TOM S. LEE , District Judge . This cause came on this date to be heard upon the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker, and the court, having fully reviewed the report and recommendation entered in this cause on November 15, 2018, and being duly advised in the premises and there being no objection 1 filed by plaintiff, finds that said report and recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this court. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the repo..
More
ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
This cause came on this date to be heard upon the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker, and the court, having fully reviewed the report and recommendation entered in this cause on November 15, 2018, and being duly advised in the premises and there being no objection1 filed by plaintiff, finds that said report and recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker entered on November 15, 2018, be, and the same is hereby adopted as the finding of this court. It follows that the complaint is dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. While the court granted plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to object, giving him until December 20, 2018, to file an objection, no objection has been received.
Source: Leagle
