TUCKER v. HOUSTON, 8:11CV445. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20120405c44
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 03, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WARREN K. URBOM, District Judge. This matter is before me on Dwight L. Tucker's Motion for Extension of Time (Filing No. 19. ) in which he asks for an extension of 120 days to file a brief in opposition to the Brief in Support of Respondents' Answer. ( Id .) By text order on March 15, 2012, I had given Tucker an extension of time until April 16, 2012, to file a brief in opposition ( See Filing No. 18.) and now I will extend that deadline
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WARREN K. URBOM, District Judge. This matter is before me on Dwight L. Tucker's Motion for Extension of Time (Filing No. 19. ) in which he asks for an extension of 120 days to file a brief in opposition to the Brief in Support of Respondents' Answer. ( Id .) By text order on March 15, 2012, I had given Tucker an extension of time until April 16, 2012, to file a brief in opposition ( See Filing No. 18.) and now I will extend that deadline...
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
WARREN K. URBOM, District Judge.
This matter is before me on Dwight L. Tucker's Motion for Extension of Time (Filing No. 19.) in which he asks for an extension of 120 days to file a brief in opposition to the Brief in Support of Respondents' Answer. (Id.) By text order on March 15, 2012, I had given Tucker an extension of time until April 16, 2012, to file a brief in opposition (See Filing No. 18.) and now I will extend that deadline. Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Tucker's Motion for Extension of Time (filing no. 19) is granted in part and Tucker shall have until August 3, 2012, to file a brief in opposition to the Brief in Support of Respondents' Answer.
Source: Leagle
