Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pacific Energy & Mining Company v. Maximilian Resources LLC, 3:17-CV-00363-HDM-VPC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180720c02 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC 61] (SECOND REQUEST) AND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO TE MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTER CLAIMS [DOC 69] (FIRST REQUEST) HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff Pacific Energy and Mining Company (" Pacific ") commenced this action against Defendant Maximilian Resources, LLC (" Maximilian " and together with Pacific, the " Parties ") seeki
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC 61]

(SECOND REQUEST)

AND

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO TE MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTER CLAIMS [DOC 69]

(FIRST REQUEST)

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Pacific Energy and Mining Company ("Pacific") commenced this action against Defendant Maximilian Resources, LLC ("Maximilian" and together with Pacific, the "Parties") seeking a declaratory judgment from this Court that certain insurance claim proceeds it received from Travelers Property Casualty Company of America are not payable to Maximilian pursuant to a Forbearance Agreement between the Parties;

WHEREAS, on June 6, 2018, Pacific filed a motion requesting that this Court issue summary judgment in its favor (the "Summary Judgment Motion");

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation agreed to by Pacific and Maximilian and so ordered by this Curt, Maximilian's current deadline to oppose the Summary Judgment Motion is July 25, 2018 (the "Summary Judgment Opposition Deadline");

WHEREAS, on July 2, 2018, Maximilian filed an answer, affirmative defenses and counter claim;

WHEREAS, the Parties remain in settlement discussions regarding the issue raised herein and certain other issues between them;

WHEREAS, on July 17, 2018, Pacific filed a motion to dismiss Maximilian's counter claims (Doc 69);

WHEREAS, Maximilian's response to the motion to dismiss is currently due on or before July 31, 2018 (the "Motion to Dismiss Opposition Deadline");

WHEREAS, while the Parties have, and will continue to, earnestly pursue settlement discussions, the vacation schedules of certain of the parties engaged in such discussions may delay them;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that adjourning the Summary Judgment Opposition Deadline and the Motion to Dismiss Opposition Deadline is in their best interests and further the goal of judicial economy;

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, of the mutual promises and covenants herein, and other consideration, the reasonableness of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

1. The Parties hereby agree that the Opposition Deadline to the Summary Judgement Motion is extended through and including September 19, 2018.

2. The Parties hereby agree that the Opposition Deadline to the Motion to Dismiss the Counter Claims is extended through and including September 19, 2018.

This is the second requested extension to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

This is the first requested extension to respond to Plaintiff's motion to dismiss the counter claims.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer