Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fir Tree Capital Management LP v. Compartment IT2, LP, 2:18-cv-00773-JAC-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181120e81 Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEFS RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 11) (First Request) ECF No. 15 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff Fir Tree Capital Management LP (f/k/a Fir Tree Inc.) d/b/a Fir Tree Partners ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Compartment IT2, LP, Compartment IT5, LP, Compartment IT9, LP, and MfAM Mobilfunk Asset Management GmbH ("Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record,
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR RESPONSE AND REPLY BRIEFS RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 11) (First Request) ECF No. 15

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff Fir Tree Capital Management LP (f/k/a Fir Tree Inc.) d/b/a Fir Tree Partners ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Compartment IT2, LP, Compartment IT5, LP, Compartment IT9, LP, and MfAM Mobilfunk Asset Management GmbH ("Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows:

1. On November 9, 2018, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) (the "Motion to Dismiss").

2. Pursuant to LR II 7-2(b), the deadline for Plaintiff's response to the Motion to Dismiss is November 23, 2018, which is the Friday immediately following the Thanksgiving holiday.

3. The parties agree that Plaintiff shall have an extension from November 23, 2018 to Monday, December 10, 2018 to file their response to the Motion to Dismiss.

4. The parties further agree that Defendants shall have an extension from December 17, 2018 until December 20, 2018 to file their reply brief in support of the Motion to Dismiss.

5. The parties' reasons underlying the requested extensions of the current deadlines are counsel's schedules and other case demands during the relevant time frame, including the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday. The parties believe that these requested extensions are reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances.

6. This is the parties' first request for an extension of the deadlines for Plaintiff to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss and Defendants to file a reply brief in support of the Motion to Dismiss. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer