REIMERS v. JBS USA, LLC, 8:13CV42. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20140626c12
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's motions for a new trial or to alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59, which the court has construed as motions for relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60, Filing No. 27 and Filing No. 28. On May 23, 2014, the court entered an order granting plaintiff fourteen (14) days to amend her pleadings or submit evidence setting forth the reasons for her failure to respond to defendan
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's motions for a new trial or to alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59, which the court has construed as motions for relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60, Filing No. 27 and Filing No. 28. On May 23, 2014, the court entered an order granting plaintiff fourteen (14) days to amend her pleadings or submit evidence setting forth the reasons for her failure to respond to defendant..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's motions for a new trial or to alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59, which the court has construed as motions for relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60, Filing No. 27 and Filing No. 28.
On May 23, 2014, the court entered an order granting plaintiff fourteen (14) days to amend her pleadings or submit evidence setting forth the reasons for her failure to respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment and present evidence of exceptional circumstances to justify relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60, Filing No. 30. The court further advised that if plaintiff failed to respond to the court's request on or before June 6, 2014, plaintiff's motions would be denied. Plaintiff has not responded to the court's May 23, 2014, order or offered any evidence.
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for a new trial, Filing No. 27 and Filing No. 28, are denied.
Source: Leagle
