Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. PENGELLY, CR-15-37-BU-DLC. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Montana Number: infdco20160608a83 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 18, 2016
Latest Update: May 18, 2016
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA JEREMIAH C. LYNCH , Magistrate Judge . The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and has entered a plea of guilty to Use of a Communication Facility in Committing, Causing, or Facilitating the Commission of a Fefony under the Controlled Substances Act, in violation of21 U.S.C. 843(b), as set forth in the Superseding Information. In exchange for Defendant's plea, the United States has agreed to the Indictment. A
More

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and has entered a plea of guilty to Use of a Communication Facility in Committing, Causing, or Facilitating the Commission of a Fefony under the Controlled Substances Act, in violation of21 U.S.C. § 843(b), as set forth in the Superseding Information. In exchange for Defendant's plea, the United States has agreed to the Indictment.

After examining the Defendant under oath, I have made the following determinations:

1. That the Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed and voluntary plea,

2. That the Defendant is aware of the nature of the charge against him and consequences of pleading guilty to the charge,

3. That the Defendant fully understands his constitutional rights, and the extent to which he is waiving those rights by pleading guilty, and

4. That the plea of guilty is a knowing and voluntary plea, supported by an independent basis in fact sufficient to prove each of the essential elements of the offense charged.

The Court further concludes that the Defendant had adequate time to review the Plea Agreement with counsel, that he fully understands each and every provision of the agreement and that all of the statements in the Plea Agreement are true. Therefore, I recommend that the Defendant be adjudged guilty of the charge set forth in the Superseding Information, and that sentence be imposed. I further recommend that the Indictment be dismissed.

This report is forwarded with the recommendation that the Court defer a decision regarding acceptance until the Court has reviewed the Plea Agreement and the presentence report.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer