Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bynum v. City of North Las Vegas, 2:17-cv-2102-APG-VCF (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180323f25 Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO JACOB PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff CHARLENE BYNUM individually, as the wife of RONALD BYNUM and as the Guardian of the Person and Estate of RONALD BYNUM, by and through her counsel of record, Dan Winder, Esq., Arnold Weinstock, Esq., Scott C. Dorman, Esq. of the Law Office of Dan M. Winder, P.C.; Defendants CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS a
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO JACOB PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff CHARLENE BYNUM individually, as the wife of RONALD BYNUM and as the Guardian of the Person and Estate of RONALD BYNUM, by and through her counsel of record, Dan Winder, Esq., Arnold Weinstock, Esq., Scott C. Dorman, Esq. of the Law Office of Dan M. Winder, P.C.; Defendants CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS and MICHELLE FREEDMAN, by and through their counsel of record, Bradford R. Jerbic and John A. Curtas; Defendants CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, OFFICERS JACOB RAY, RODRIGO DELARA, JOHN E. TONRY, JESSE LEE CESENA, CHIEF ALEXANDER PEREZ, AND FIRE CHIEF JEFFERY K. LYTLE, by and through their counsel of record, Robert Freeman, Esq., of the law firm Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP; and Defendant CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, by and through its counsel of record, S. Brent Vogel, Esq., and John M. Orr, Esq., of the law frim Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, that the time for Defendant Correct Care Solutions, LLC to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint [#1], on file herein, is hereby extended up to and including March 29, 2018. The stipulation is entered to allow counsel sufficient time to consult with Defendant Correct Care Solutions, LLC and investigate the allegations of the Complaint prior to filing a responsive pleading.

This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. Defendant Correct Care Solutions, LLC is not disputing service of process. This is the first extension of time requested by counsel for filing Defendant Correct Care Solutions, LLC's responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer