United States v. Ochsner, CR 19-73-BLG-DLC. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20200303c59
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 02, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . The Government moves to dismiss the Superseding Indictment (Doc. 30) without prejudice. (Doc. 40.) The Government represents that, if the Defendant complies with the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement into which she has entered, it will move to dismiss the Superseding Indictment with prejudice at a later date. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 40) is GRANTED, and the Superseding Indictment (Doc. 30) is DISMISSED WIT
Summary: ORDER DANA L. CHRISTENSEN , Chief District Judge . The Government moves to dismiss the Superseding Indictment (Doc. 30) without prejudice. (Doc. 40.) The Government represents that, if the Defendant complies with the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement into which she has entered, it will move to dismiss the Superseding Indictment with prejudice at a later date. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 40) is GRANTED, and the Superseding Indictment (Doc. 30) is DISMISSED WITH..
More
ORDER
DANA L. CHRISTENSEN, Chief District Judge.
The Government moves to dismiss the Superseding Indictment (Doc. 30) without prejudice. (Doc. 40.) The Government represents that, if the Defendant complies with the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement into which she has entered, it will move to dismiss the Superseding Indictment with prejudice at a later date.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 40) is GRANTED, and the Superseding Indictment (Doc. 30) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
