U.S. v. Heinz, 8:18CR293. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190221e80
Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant Davis' Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [35]. Counsel is seeking additional time to finalize plea negotiations. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant Davis' Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [35] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for February 26, 2019, is continued to April 23, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant Davis' Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [35]. Counsel is seeking additional time to finalize plea negotiations. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant Davis' Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [35] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for February 26, 2019, is continued to April 23, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the c..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant Davis' Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [35]. Counsel is seeking additional time to finalize plea negotiations. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant Davis' Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [35] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for February 26, 2019, is continued to April 23, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and April 23, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
