MANNING v. COLVIN, 1:10CV928. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20140326d94
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. BEATY, Jr., District Judge. On February 7, 2014, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and served on the parties in this action, and a copy was given to the court. Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, counsel for Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation. The court has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Ju
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. BEATY, Jr., District Judge. On February 7, 2014, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and served on the parties in this action, and a copy was given to the court. Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, counsel for Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation. The court has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Jud..
More
ORDER
JAMES A. BEATY, Jr., District Judge.
On February 7, 2014, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and served on the parties in this action, and a copy was given to the court.
Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, counsel for Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation.
The court has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings [Docket No. 9] is DENIED, that Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [Docket No. 12] is GRANTED and that the final decision of the Commissioner be upheld. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.
Source: Leagle
