Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

VENTURES TRUST 2013-I-H-R BY MCM CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC v. SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 4683 AMERTRINE, 2:15-cv-01773-JAD-CWH. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160218d27 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE VILLA AT BLUE VILLAS DIAMOND'S MOTION TO DISMISS (FirstRequest) ORDER JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . COMES NOW VENTURES TRUST 2013-I-H-R BY MCM CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, (hereinafter "Ventures") by and through their counsel of record Thomas N. Beckom, Esq of the law firm of McCarthy & Holthus LLP; and VILLAS AT BLUE DIAMOND SPRINGS ASSOCIATION ("HOA") by and through their counsel of record David T. Gluth, Esq. of the law firm of Gordon & Rees
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE VILLA AT BLUE VILLAS DIAMOND'S MOTION TO DISMISS (FirstRequest)

ORDER

COMES NOW VENTURES TRUST 2013-I-H-R BY MCM CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, (hereinafter "Ventures") by and through their counsel of record Thomas N. Beckom, Esq of the law firm of McCarthy & Holthus LLP; and VILLAS AT BLUE DIAMOND SPRINGS ASSOCIATION ("HOA") by and through their counsel of record David T. Gluth, Esq. of the law firm of Gordon & Rees LLP and hereby file this Stipulation and Order Extending the Deadlines for Ventures to respond to Saticoy's Motion to Dismiss filed on January 28, 2016 (Dkt.# 35) pursuant to LR 6-1.

RECITALS

1. On January 28, 2016 the HOA filed a Motion to Dismiss the Quiet Title Complaint filed by Ventures. (Dkt.# 35). Currently responses are due by February 28, 2016 and as such this stipulation has been filed timely pursuant to LR 6-11.

2. Ventures has not previously asked for extension to respond to this motion.

3. Ventures respectfully request additional time to respond to the HOA's Motion in light of the recent Nevada Supreme Court opinion in Shadow Wood Homeowners Association v. N.Y Comm Bank, a recently announced opinion from the Nevada Supreme Court.

STIPULATION

It is hereby STIPULATED that Ventures shall have until March 1, 2016 to respond to Saticoy's Motion to Dismiss filed January 28, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The Docket reflects the response date as Sunday February 14, 2016; but the stipulation is timely pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro 6(a)(1)(C) as the 14th was a Sunday and the 15th was a Federal Holiday. Available at https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/snow-dismissal-procedures/federal-holidays/#url=2016 (Last visited February 16, 2016)
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer