Whitt v. Richland Holdings, Inc.,, 2:17-cv-00014-APG-NJK. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171129d55
Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2017
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 37) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to extend time to respond to Defendants' motion to produce credit reports, filed on November 27, 2017. Docket No. 37; see also Docket No. 34 (motion to produce credit reports). Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion to produce credit reports was due no later than November 23, 2017. Plaintiff requests an extension of seven days to respond. For good cause and excusable neglect shown
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 37) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to extend time to respond to Defendants' motion to produce credit reports, filed on November 27, 2017. Docket No. 37; see also Docket No. 34 (motion to produce credit reports). Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion to produce credit reports was due no later than November 23, 2017. Plaintiff requests an extension of seven days to respond. For good cause and excusable neglect shown,..
More
ORDER
(Docket No. 37)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to extend time to respond to Defendants' motion to produce credit reports, filed on November 27, 2017. Docket No. 37; see also Docket No. 34 (motion to produce credit reports). Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion to produce credit reports was due no later than November 23, 2017. Plaintiff requests an extension of seven days to respond. For good cause and excusable neglect shown, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to extend time to respond to Defendants' motion to produce credit reports. Docket No. 37. Plaintiff shall file a response no later than November 30, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
