Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ortega v. Nevada, 2:18-cv-01630-RFB-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181030c36 Visitors: 26
Filed: Oct. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . On September 5, 2018, the Court dismissed this pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus as improperly commenced because it was commenced without any petition. (ECF No. 3). In dismissing this action, the Court advised petitioner that no more documents could be filed in this case and that any petition and application to proceed in forma pauperis should be filed, if at all, only in a new action. ( Id. ) Thereafter, on October 18, 2018, pet
More

ORDER

On September 5, 2018, the Court dismissed this pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus as improperly commenced because it was commenced without any petition. (ECF No. 3). In dismissing this action, the Court advised petitioner that no more documents could be filed in this case and that any petition and application to proceed in forma pauperis should be filed, if at all, only in a new action. (Id.)

Thereafter, on October 18, 2018, petitioner filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He captioned the filings with this case number and so they were filed in this case. Because this action is closed and petitioner has been advised to file any new pauper application and petition in a new action only, IT IS ORDERED the application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition filed on October 18, 2018, (ECF No. 5 & 5-1) are hereby STRICKEN.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of the pauper application and petition filed with the Court on October 18, 2018 (ECF Nos. 5 & 5-1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer