Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Carter v. Richland Holdings, Inc., 2:16-cv-02967-RFB-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171213g25 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2017
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court are Defendants' Motion for Order to Produce Credit Reports (ECF No. 54) and Plaintiffs' First Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Produce Credit Reports (ECF No. 56). Under LR 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion. No o
More

ORDER

Before the Court are Defendants' Motion for Order to Produce Credit Reports (ECF No. 54) and Plaintiffs' First Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Produce Credit Reports (ECF No. 56).

Under LR 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion. No opposition was filed to the Motion For Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Produce Credit Reports (ECF No. 56). Plaintiffs have given good cause for the filing delay of the response to the motion for order to produce credit reports. Id.

Accordingly, and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' First Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Produce Credit Reports (ECF No. 56) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on Defendants' Motion for Order to Produce Credit Reports (ECF No. 54) is scheduled for 2:00 PM, January 4, 2018, in Courtroom 3D.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer