MONTOYA v. SMITH, 2:16cv0032-JAD-VCF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160420913
Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) JENNIFER A DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that the deadline for Defendant DANIELLE K. PIEPER to file her Reply in support of her Motion to Dismiss in this matter be extended one week. This extension is necessary as Defendant's counsel has multiple dispositive motion related brief in other cases warranting a brie
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) JENNIFER A DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that the deadline for Defendant DANIELLE K. PIEPER to file her Reply in support of her Motion to Dismiss in this matter be extended one week. This extension is necessary as Defendant's counsel has multiple dispositive motion related brief in other cases warranting a brief..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
(First Request)
JENNIFER A DORSEY, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that the deadline for Defendant DANIELLE K. PIEPER to file her Reply in support of her Motion to Dismiss in this matter be extended one week. This extension is necessary as Defendant's counsel has multiple dispositive motion related brief in other cases warranting a brief one week extension.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
