Marhold v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, 2:18-cv-01621-KJD-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181210e09
Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (First Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff William T. Marhold ("Plaintiff") and Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation ("PHH") stipulate and agree that PHH may have up to and including December 17, 2018 to respond to Plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1). This additional time will accommodate the schedule of counsel, provide time for the parties to investigate Plaintiff's all
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (First Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff William T. Marhold ("Plaintiff") and Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation ("PHH") stipulate and agree that PHH may have up to and including December 17, 2018 to respond to Plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1). This additional time will accommodate the schedule of counsel, provide time for the parties to investigate Plaintiff's alle..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
(First Request)
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff William T. Marhold ("Plaintiff") and Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation ("PHH") stipulate and agree that PHH may have up to and including December 17, 2018 to respond to Plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1). This additional time will accommodate the schedule of counsel, provide time for the parties to investigate Plaintiff's allegations and for PHH to prepare a response.
This is the parties' first request to extend this deadline, and it is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
