LENHARDT v. SYSCO CORPORATION, CV 16-153-BLG-SPW-TJC. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20170213b05
Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CAVAN , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Tracy Lenhardt's Motion for Oral Argument on Defendant Sysco Corporation's Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 20.) The Court entered its Findings and Recommendations on Sysco's motion on February 9, 2017. (Doc. 21.) The Court's Findings and Recommendations were based on the record before it, including Plaintiff's Complaint (Docs. 5, 7), Defendant's motion (Doc. 12), and the briefing attendant to Defendant's motion. (Docs. 13, 1
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CAVAN , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Tracy Lenhardt's Motion for Oral Argument on Defendant Sysco Corporation's Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 20.) The Court entered its Findings and Recommendations on Sysco's motion on February 9, 2017. (Doc. 21.) The Court's Findings and Recommendations were based on the record before it, including Plaintiff's Complaint (Docs. 5, 7), Defendant's motion (Doc. 12), and the briefing attendant to Defendant's motion. (Docs. 13, 17..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. CAVAN, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Tracy Lenhardt's Motion for Oral Argument on Defendant Sysco Corporation's Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 20.) The Court entered its Findings and Recommendations on Sysco's motion on February 9, 2017. (Doc. 21.) The Court's Findings and Recommendations were based on the record before it, including Plaintiff's Complaint (Docs. 5, 7), Defendant's motion (Doc. 12), and the briefing attendant to Defendant's motion. (Docs. 13, 17, 19.) Oral argument would not have aided the Court. Accordingly,
Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Argument on Defendant Sysco Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 20) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
