FERNANDEZ v. STATE, 3:06-cv-00628-LRH-WGC. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120323b73
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2012
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#591 1 ) entered on February 9, 2012, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing and Limited Discovery (#552) filed on August 23, 2011, be denied. Plaintiff filed his Objections to the Report and Recommendation (#611) on March 5, 2012. Defendants have not filed a response to the objections. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of t
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#591 1 ) entered on February 9, 2012, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing and Limited Discovery (#552) filed on August 23, 2011, be denied. Plaintiff filed his Objections to the Report and Recommendation (#611) on March 5, 2012. Defendants have not filed a response to the objections. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of th..
More
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#5911) entered on February 9, 2012, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing and Limited Discovery (#552) filed on August 23, 2011, be denied. Plaintiff filed his Objections to the Report and Recommendation (#611) on March 5, 2012. Defendants have not filed a response to the objections. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Local Rule 1B 3-1(a) of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
It appearing to the Court that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is neither erroneous nor contrary to law, and good cause appearing, the Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#591) entered on February 9, 2012, is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED, and Plaintiff's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing and Limited Discovery (#552) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Refers to court's docket number.
Source: Leagle
