Castillo v. Legrand, 3:13-cv-00704-LRH-VPC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180202f74
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . This is petitioner Gerardo Castillo's pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. In light of the stipulation to stay proceedings, IT IS ORDERED that respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 54) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to conduct discovery (ECF No. 59) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents first, second, and third motions
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . This is petitioner Gerardo Castillo's pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. In light of the stipulation to stay proceedings, IT IS ORDERED that respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 54) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to conduct discovery (ECF No. 59) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents first, second, and third motions f..
More
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
This is petitioner Gerardo Castillo's pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In light of the stipulation to stay proceedings,
IT IS ORDERED that respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 54) is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to conduct discovery (ECF No. 59) is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents first, second, and third motions for extension of time to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss (ECF Nos. 61, 62, 63) are all DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively close this case.
Source: Leagle
