KILE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., 3:13-cv-00142-HDM-VPC. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140701b32
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge. Before the court is plaintiff Kile's motion for a spoliation instruction at trial (#35). The defendant has opposed (#38) and the plaintiff has replied (#40). Discovery in this case is not yet complete, and the court believes the request for a spoliation instruction is premature at this time. Accordingly, the plaintiff's (#35) motion for a spoliation instruction is hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, to be renewed at trial should the plaintiff so move.
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge. Before the court is plaintiff Kile's motion for a spoliation instruction at trial (#35). The defendant has opposed (#38) and the plaintiff has replied (#40). Discovery in this case is not yet complete, and the court believes the request for a spoliation instruction is premature at this time. Accordingly, the plaintiff's (#35) motion for a spoliation instruction is hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, to be renewed at trial should the plaintiff so move. ..
More
ORDER
HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge.
Before the court is plaintiff Kile's motion for a spoliation instruction at trial (#35). The defendant has opposed (#38) and the plaintiff has replied (#40).
Discovery in this case is not yet complete, and the court believes the request for a spoliation instruction is premature at this time.
Accordingly, the plaintiff's (#35) motion for a spoliation instruction is hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, to be renewed at trial should the plaintiff so move.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
