Brooks v. Plusfour, Inc., 2:17-cv-01529-APG-VCF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170706d93
Visitors: 36
Filed: Jul. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2017
Summary: MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS LITTON MORTGAGE SERVICE CENTER AND OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Defendants Litton Mortgage Service Center ("Litton") and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC ("Ocwen") move to extend the deadline for Litton and Ocwen to respond to the Complaint from June 28, 2017 through and including July 18, 2017. This is the first extension sought by Litton and Ocwen. On June 23, 2017
Summary: MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS LITTON MORTGAGE SERVICE CENTER AND OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Defendants Litton Mortgage Service Center ("Litton") and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC ("Ocwen") move to extend the deadline for Litton and Ocwen to respond to the Complaint from June 28, 2017 through and including July 18, 2017. This is the first extension sought by Litton and Ocwen. On June 23, 2017,..
More
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS LITTON MORTGAGE SERVICE CENTER AND OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Defendants Litton Mortgage Service Center ("Litton") and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC ("Ocwen") move to extend the deadline for Litton and Ocwen to respond to the Complaint from June 28, 2017 through and including July 18, 2017. This is the first extension sought by Litton and Ocwen. On June 23, 2017, counsel for Ocwen and Litton contacted plaintiff's counsel and the parties agreed to an extension for Ocwen and Litton to respond to the Complaint through and including July 18, 2017. Due to an oversight the parties did not promptly get a stipulation on file with the Court. Counsel for Ocwen and Litton attempted to contact counsel for plaintiff regarding the form of an extension but were unable to get a response. Ocwen and Litton understand that Plaintiff does not object to this extension. Ocwen and Litton seek this extension in good faith to allow Defendants to additional time to evaluate the facts of the case prior to responding to the Complaint.
A proposed form of order is submitted herewith.
Source: Leagle
