United States v. Perkhiser, 8:19CR268. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20200213f51
Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [24]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 90-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by May 11, 2020. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [24] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before May 11, 2020. 2. The ends of
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [24]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 90-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by May 11, 2020. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [24] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before May 11, 2020. 2. The ends of j..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [24]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 90-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by May 11, 2020.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Pretrial Motions Deadline [24] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before May 11, 2020.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between February 11, 2020 and May 11, 2020, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
