Pinkston v. Foster, 2:07-cv-01305-KJD-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180621d94
Visitors: 26
Filed: Jun. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Before the court are motions for extension of time by both parties (ECF Nos. 95, 97). Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that respondents' motion for extension of time to file an answer to the petition (ECF No. 95) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF No.
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Before the court are motions for extension of time by both parties (ECF Nos. 95, 97). Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that respondents' motion for extension of time to file an answer to the petition (ECF No. 95) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF No. ..
More
ORDER
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
Before the court are motions for extension of time by both parties (ECF Nos. 95, 97). Good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that respondents' motion for extension of time to file an answer to the petition (ECF No. 95) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF No. 97) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.
Source: Leagle
