Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McKISSICK v. CITY OF RENO, 3:17-CV-00458-MMD-VPC. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171116f14 Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECUSE THE RENO CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE (FIRST REQUEST). MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, MARK MAUSERT, and Defendant, by and through its attorneys, KARL S. HALL, Reno City Attorney, and WILLIAM E. COOPER, Deputy City Attorney, herby stipulate to extend the Defendant's deadline to file a Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse the Reno City Atto
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECUSE THE RENO CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE (FIRST REQUEST).

Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, MARK MAUSERT, and Defendant, by and through its attorneys, KARL S. HALL, Reno City Attorney, and WILLIAM E. COOPER, Deputy City Attorney, herby stipulate to extend the Defendant's deadline to file a Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse the Reno City Attorney's Office from November 14, 2017 to November 17, 2017.

The extension of this deadline is requested to accommodate counsels' schedule, and is not brought for any improper purpose or undue delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer