Bank of New York Mellon v. Washington & Sandhill Homeowners Association, 2:17-cv-02006-RFB-GWF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171114d04
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO WASHINGTON & SANDHILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a the Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWABS, Inc., Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-BC2 ( BoNYM ), and Washington & Sandhill Homeowners Association ( Washington ), hereby stipulate and agree that BoNYM shall have an additional twenty
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO WASHINGTON & SANDHILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a the Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWABS, Inc., Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-BC2 ( BoNYM ), and Washington & Sandhill Homeowners Association ( Washington ), hereby stipulate and agree that BoNYM shall have an additional twenty ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO WASHINGTON & SANDHILL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a the Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWABS, Inc., Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-BC2 (BoNYM), and Washington & Sandhill Homeowners Association (Washington), hereby stipulate and agree that BoNYM shall have an additional twenty (20) days, up to and including December 7, 2017, to file its response to Washington's motion to dismiss complaint, which is currently due on November 17, 2017, pursuant to ECF No. 26. Washington's motion to dismiss was filed on November 3, 2017.
BoNYM's counsel is requesting additional time in order to allow BoNYM time to review the response before it is filed.
This is the parties' first request for an extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
