STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRAVATA AND MONTAGE AT SUMMERLIN CENTRE TO FILE THEIR REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(FIRST REQUEST)

JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) and defendants Travata and Montage at Summerlin Centre (Travata) and NV Eagles, LLC (NV Eagles) (collectively, the Parties) hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On January 17, 2017, BANA filed its motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 36. Travata filed its motion for summary judgment on the same date. ECF No. 37. On February 7, 2017, Travata filed its opposition to BANA's motion for summary judgment and NV Eagles opposition was filed on February 8, 2017. ECF Nos. 42, 46. BANA filed its opposition to Travata's motion for summary judgment on February 7, 2017. ECF No. 41.

2. Counsel for BANA needs additional time to reply to the arguments raised in Travata's and NV Eagles' responses, in light of the developing case law and recent decisions issued by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and Nevada Supreme Court, which affect this case and others like it. The additional time will allow BANA to properly address the issues raised.

3. Counsel for Travata needs additional time to reply to the arguments raised in BANA's responses.

4. Presently BANA's replies are currently due on February 21, 2017 (Travata) and February 22, 2017 (NV Eagles). Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, BANA shall have an extension of time until March 3, 2017, in which to file its replies in support of its motion for summary judgment in response to Travata's and NV Eagles' oppositions.

5. Presently Travata's reply is currently due on February 21, 2017. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, Travata shall have an extension of time until March 3, 2017, in which to file its reply....

6. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED: