United States v. Lopez, 8:19CR244. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20191209b04
Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant Baker's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [31]. Counsel is seeking additional time to reach a resolution in this matter. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Baker's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [31] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for December 10, 2019, is continued to January 28, 2020. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A),
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant Baker's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [31]. Counsel is seeking additional time to reach a resolution in this matter. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Baker's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [31] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for December 10, 2019, is continued to January 28, 2020. 2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), t..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant Baker's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [31]. Counsel is seeking additional time to reach a resolution in this matter. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Baker's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [31] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, as to both defendants, now set for December 10, 2019, is continued to January 28, 2020.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and January 28, 2020 shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6), (7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
