RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC. v. LV REAL ESTATE STRATEGIC INVESTMENT GROUP LLC SERIES 5112, 2:17-cv-00084-JCM-NJK. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170411c19
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Docket No. 13. Under Local Rule 26-1(b)(1),"[u]nless the court orders otherwise, discovery periods longer than 180 days from the date the first defendant answers or otherwise appears will require special scheduling review." Additionally, "[p]lans requesting special scheduling review must include . . . a statement of the reasons why longer or different
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Docket No. 13. Under Local Rule 26-1(b)(1),"[u]nless the court orders otherwise, discovery periods longer than 180 days from the date the first defendant answers or otherwise appears will require special scheduling review." Additionally, "[p]lans requesting special scheduling review must include . . . a statement of the reasons why longer or different t..
More
ORDER
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Docket No. 13. Under Local Rule 26-1(b)(1),"[u]nless the court orders otherwise, discovery periods longer than 180 days from the date the first defendant answers or otherwise appears will require special scheduling review." Additionally, "[p]lans requesting special scheduling review must include . . . a statement of the reasons why longer or different time periods should apply to the case." Local Rule 26-1(a). The parties' proposed discovery plan does not comply with this Court's Local Rules because the parties request a discovery period of 284 days, without explaining why longer or different time periods should apply to this case. Docket No. 13 at 2-3.
Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES the parties' stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Docket No. 13. The parties shall file a proposed discovery plan that complies with the Local Rules, no later than April 14, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
