U.S. v. Krisnik, 18-cr-32 (JNE/BRT). (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20181003f77
Visitors: 20
Filed: Oct. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN , District Judge . In a Report and Recommendation dated August 22, 2018, the Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the Court deny Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from the Search of Defendant's Residence. ECF No. 32. Defendant objected, ECF No. 33, and the United States responded, ECF No. 34. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2. Based on that review
Summary: ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN , District Judge . In a Report and Recommendation dated August 22, 2018, the Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the Court deny Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from the Search of Defendant's Residence. ECF No. 32. Defendant objected, ECF No. 33, and the United States responded, ECF No. 34. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2. Based on that review,..
More
ORDER
JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge.
In a Report and Recommendation dated August 22, 2018, the Honorable Becky R. Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the Court deny Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from the Search of Defendant's Residence. ECF No. 32. Defendant objected, ECF No. 33, and the United States responded, ECF No. 34. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2. Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from the Search of Defendant's Residence [ECF No. 22] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
