Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. REDROCK PARK HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, 2:16-cv-00659-JCM-NJK. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160720c51 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against Defendant LV Real Estate Strategic Investments, LLC ("LVRES"), its member and attorney Jeff Brauer, and its other members Jun Wu, Jacob Lefkowitz and Edward Sun, and why sanctions should not be imposed against Defendant ATC Assessment Collection Group, LLC ("ATC"), its attorney Michael McKelleb, and its member Paul Terry. Docket No. 30. The order to show c
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court is an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against Defendant LV Real Estate Strategic Investments, LLC ("LVRES"), its member and attorney Jeff Brauer, and its other members Jun Wu, Jacob Lefkowitz and Edward Sun, and why sanctions should not be imposed against Defendant ATC Assessment Collection Group, LLC ("ATC"), its attorney Michael McKelleb, and its member Paul Terry. Docket No. 30. The order to show cause arises out of the above parties', attorneys', and members' failure to comply with the Court's orders to submit evidence substantiating citizenship for purposes of determining whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction in this case. See id. The Court has received written responses. Docket Nos. 31, 32. The Court hereby SETS a hearing on the order to show cause for 9:00 a.m. on August 2, 2016, in Courtroom 3D. Personal attendance is required for Jeff Brauer, Jun Wu, Jacob Lefkowitz, Edward Sun, Michael McKelleb, and Paul Terry. Failure to appear for the hearing may subject these persons to significant sanctions and may result in the institution of contempt proceedings. In addition, Jeff Brauer, Jun Wu, Jacob Lefkowitz, and Edward Sun shall each be prepared to discuss their state of citizenship.

All counsel shall also be prepared to discuss whether the Court's jurisdictional analysis is altered in any way by the recently-filed stipulation to substitute parties. Cf. Freeport-McMoran, Inc. v. KN Energy, Inc., 498 U.S. 426, 427 (1991) (noting the "well-established rule that diversity of jurisdiction is assessed at the time the action is filed" and is not generally altered by "subsequent events").

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer