Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ARMSTRONG v. REYNOLDS, 2:17-cv-02528. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171027h41 Visitors: 33
Filed: Oct. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AGAINST TERRY REYNOLDS, STEVE GEORGE, JESS LANKFORD AND LARA PELLEGRINI UNTIL NOVEMBER 16, 2017 (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between DEFENDANTS TERRY REYNOLDS, Deputy Director of Nevada Department of Business and Industry; STEVE GEORGE, Administrator of the Nevada Division of Industrial Relations; JESS LANKFORD, Chief Administrative Officer of Nevada OSHA; a
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AGAINST TERRY REYNOLDS, STEVE GEORGE, JESS LANKFORD AND LARA PELLEGRINI UNTIL NOVEMBER 16, 2017 (FIRST REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between DEFENDANTS TERRY REYNOLDS, Deputy Director of Nevada Department of Business and Industry; STEVE GEORGE, Administrator of the Nevada Division of Industrial Relations; JESS LANKFORD, Chief Administrative Officer of Nevada OSHA; and LARA PELLEGRINI, Whistleblower Chief Investigator of Nevada OSHA (collectively the "State Defendants"), by and through counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General Vivienne Rakowsky, Deputy Attorney General Peter Keegan, and PLAINTIFF HELEN ARMSTRONG, by and through counsel, Joel F. Hansen of Cooper Levenson, P.A., that the date for State Defendants to respond to the Complaint (ECF No. 1) will be continued to November 16, 2017.

Good cause exists to continue the date to respond to the Complaint based on the time necessary to gather information from four different State Defendants and respond.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer