Guidi v. Quality Loan Service Corp., 2:17-cv-02946-APG-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180108983
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Richey Garrison Guidi's notice to the Court of Defendants' non-compliance (ECF No. 12), filed on December 20, 2017. Defendant filed a response (ECF No. 15) on December 28, 2017. This document is styled as a "notice" but appears to be a motion to strike. Given Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court will construe the document as a motion to strike. Plaintiff's notice requests that the Court strike Defen
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Richey Garrison Guidi's notice to the Court of Defendants' non-compliance (ECF No. 12), filed on December 20, 2017. Defendant filed a response (ECF No. 15) on December 28, 2017. This document is styled as a "notice" but appears to be a motion to strike. Given Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court will construe the document as a motion to strike. Plaintiff's notice requests that the Court strike Defend..
More
ORDER
C.W. HOFFMAN, JR., Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Richey Garrison Guidi's notice to the Court of Defendants' non-compliance (ECF No. 12), filed on December 20, 2017. Defendant filed a response (ECF No. 15) on December 28, 2017. This document is styled as a "notice" but appears to be a motion to strike. Given Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court will construe the document as a motion to strike.
Plaintiff's notice requests that the Court strike Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 6), arguing that the motion failed to comply with Local Rule IA 10-1, which requires that all documents filed with the Court must be legible and must not be double-sided. Plaintiff argues that Defendant's motion to dismiss was mailed to him were "doubled sided and disheveled making it impossible for Plaintiff to reference." However, Local Rule IA 10-1 applies to documents filed with the Court, not documents served on parties. Further, as Plaintiff was able to file a response (ECF No. 9) to Defendant's motion to dismiss, the Court finds no prejudice.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to strike is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
