Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Evans v. University Medical Center, 2:15-cv-01136-MMD-(CWH). (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180516g80 Visitors: 20
Filed: May 14, 2018
Latest Update: May 14, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 82) AND DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF No. 84) [FIRST REQUEST] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff Nori Evans and Defendant University Medical Center, by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have two (2) additional weeks to file
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 82) AND DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF No. 84)

[FIRST REQUEST]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff Nori Evans and Defendant University Medical Center, by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have two (2) additional weeks to file and serve her Response to Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 82). The parties agree the deadline for filing Plaintiff's Response shall now be Tuesday, May 29, 2018.

IT IS ALSO STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendant shall have two (2) additional weeks to file and serve its response to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Interlocutory Order (ECF No. 84). The parties agree the deadline for filing Plaintiff's Response shall now be Tuesday, June 4, 2018.

The reasons for this request are the following:

1. Defendant's counsel was involved in a car accident that was caused by an apparent intoxicated motorist. As a result, he has been required to take a number of days off in order to seek treatment and recover. He also is expected to miss additional time from work in the near future. 2. In addition to the normal, anticipated workload, Plaintiff's counsel has been working on a Petition for Rehearing in the Nevada Supreme Court in the case Abate v. Ace Cab, case no. 68849, a deadline on the same day Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment is currently due in this matter, May 15, 2018. 3. The parties have not sought to extend these deadlines before and merely request two additional weeks. 4. This stipulation is entered into in good faith and not to cause undue delay.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff shall have until Tuesday, May 29, 2018 to file her Response to Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 82).

IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED Defendant shall have until Tuesday, June 4, 2018 to file its response to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Interlocutory Order (ECF No. 84).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer