Cale-Powell v. Clark County, 2:19-cv-00981-JCM-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190916858
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 24) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' discovery plan. Docket No. 24. For the reasons stated below, the discovery plan is DENIED. The presumptively reasonable discovery period is 180 days, measured from the date of the first appearance of any defendant. Local Rule 26-1(b)(1). Defendant Clark County filed a motion to dismiss on July 22, 2019; therefore, the presumptively reasonable discovery cut-off is measured from that date.
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 24) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' discovery plan. Docket No. 24. For the reasons stated below, the discovery plan is DENIED. The presumptively reasonable discovery period is 180 days, measured from the date of the first appearance of any defendant. Local Rule 26-1(b)(1). Defendant Clark County filed a motion to dismiss on July 22, 2019; therefore, the presumptively reasonable discovery cut-off is measured from that date. I..
More
ORDER
(Docket No. 24)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the parties' discovery plan. Docket No. 24. For the reasons stated below, the discovery plan is DENIED.
The presumptively reasonable discovery period is 180 days, measured from the date of the first appearance of any defendant. Local Rule 26-1(b)(1). Defendant Clark County filed a motion to dismiss on July 22, 2019; therefore, the presumptively reasonable discovery cut-off is measured from that date.
If the parties seek deadlines beyond those specified in Local Rule 26-1(b)(1), their discovery plan must comply with Local Rule 26-1(a). The parties must submit a discovery plan that complies with Local Rule 26-1, no later than September 18, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
