STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR THE FILING OF DEFENDANT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 12)

CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm"), by and through its attorneys of record, the law firm of LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, and Plaintiff Donna Arlene Thelin ("Plaintiff"), by and through her counsel of record, THE702FIRM, as follows:

Whereas the due date for the State Farm's Response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12), is currently due on July 26, 2019;

Whereas the deadline for State Farm's response to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (ECF No. 13) is also currently due July 26, 2019;

Whereas State Farm is concurrently filing its Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand wherein State Farm states that while diversity jurisdiction does exist, State Farm does not oppose remand based on Plaintiff's representations that the amount in controversy is less than $75,000; and,

Whereas the decision on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand will determine whether the matter will proceed in this Court or in the Eighth Judicial District, Clark County, Nevada;

IT IS HEREBY AGREED that the deadline for State Farm to file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12) will be extended to fourteen (14) days after the Court's decision on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 13).

This is the parties' first request to extend this deadline, which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.