Villaverde v. Smith, 3:10-cv-00347-MMD-WGC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180516h08
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 15, 2018
Latest Update: May 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . On March 28, 2016, this Court denied Sally D. Villaverde's ("Petitioner") pro se 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus, and entered judgment (ECF Nos. 70, 71). Petitioner filed a notice of appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which denied Petitioner a certificate of appealability on August 26, 2016 (ECF No. 74). The United States Supreme Court denied Petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari on May 2, 2017, and denied his
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . On March 28, 2016, this Court denied Sally D. Villaverde's ("Petitioner") pro se 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus, and entered judgment (ECF Nos. 70, 71). Petitioner filed a notice of appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which denied Petitioner a certificate of appealability on August 26, 2016 (ECF No. 74). The United States Supreme Court denied Petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari on May 2, 2017, and denied his p..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
On March 28, 2016, this Court denied Sally D. Villaverde's ("Petitioner") pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus, and entered judgment (ECF Nos. 70, 71). Petitioner filed a notice of appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which denied Petitioner a certificate of appealability on August 26, 2016 (ECF No. 74). The United States Supreme Court denied Petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari on May 2, 2017, and denied his petition for rehearing on October 5, 2017 (ECF Nos. 77, 79). On May 9, 2018, Petitioner filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court (ECF No. 86). However, as set forth in detail, this case is closed.
It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 86) is denied.
It is further ordered that Petitioner must not file any more documents or motions in this closed case.
Source: Leagle