Technical LED Intellectual Property, LLC v. Brand W, LLC, 3:18-cv-00290-MMD-VPC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180807972
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT (FIRST REQUEST) VALERIE P. COOKE , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed between Plaintiff Technical LED Intellectual Property, LLC, through its counsel of record, Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC and Louis M. Heidelberger, and Defendant Brand W, LLC d/b/a Ecolocity LED ("Brand W"), by and through its attorneys, Dickinson Wright, PLLC as follows: Defendant Br
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT (FIRST REQUEST) VALERIE P. COOKE , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed between Plaintiff Technical LED Intellectual Property, LLC, through its counsel of record, Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC and Louis M. Heidelberger, and Defendant Brand W, LLC d/b/a Ecolocity LED ("Brand W"), by and through its attorneys, Dickinson Wright, PLLC as follows: Defendant Bra..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT (FIRST REQUEST)
VALERIE P. COOKE, Magistrate Judge.
It is hereby stipulated and agreed between Plaintiff Technical LED Intellectual Property, LLC, through its counsel of record, Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC and Louis M. Heidelberger, and Defendant Brand W, LLC d/b/a Ecolocity LED ("Brand W"), by and through its attorneys, Dickinson Wright, PLLC as follows:
Defendant Brand W shall have to and including August 15, 2018 in which to file any response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. This extension is agreed to for the convenience of the parties and their counsel and not for any purpose of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
