VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. APPLE, INC., 2:16-CV-00260-RFB-VCF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160523a48
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 20, 2016
Latest Update: May 20, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT APPLE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND COMPLAINT (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and District of Nevada Local Rule IA 6-1, Plaintiff Voip-Pal.com, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Apple, Inc. ("Defendant") state the following: The Complaint was filed on February 9, 2016. The First Amended Complaint was filed on April 6, 2016. The Second
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT APPLE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND COMPLAINT (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and District of Nevada Local Rule IA 6-1, Plaintiff Voip-Pal.com, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Apple, Inc. ("Defendant") state the following: The Complaint was filed on February 9, 2016. The First Amended Complaint was filed on April 6, 2016. The Second A..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANT APPLE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND COMPLAINT (First Request)
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and District of Nevada Local Rule IA 6-1, Plaintiff Voip-Pal.com, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Apple, Inc. ("Defendant") state the following:
The Complaint was filed on February 9, 2016. The First Amended Complaint was filed on April 6, 2016. The Second Amended Complaint was filed on May 5, 2016. The Second Amended Complaint contains additional allegations not alleged in the Complaint or in the First Amended Complaint. Good cause exists for the requested extension of time. Defendant needs additional time to evaluate all of the claims alleged in the Second Amended Complaint, including the allegations not included in the Complaint or in the First Amended Complaint. Accordingly, Defendant has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed, to grant Defendant an extension of time, up to and including July 29, 2016, to file and serve its answer or other response to the Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED:
Source: Leagle
