YESKE v. BENDETOV, 2:15-cv-01513-GMN-NJK. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20151028d90
Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 14) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 14. The discovery plan is hereby DENIED without prejudice. See Local Rule 26-1(d) (discovery plans must be submitted jointly). The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer, in compliance with the Court's Local Rules, with regard to the proposed discovery plan. The parties must, no later than November 13, 2015, either file a proper joint discovery plan or sho
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 14) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 14. The discovery plan is hereby DENIED without prejudice. See Local Rule 26-1(d) (discovery plans must be submitted jointly). The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer, in compliance with the Court's Local Rules, with regard to the proposed discovery plan. The parties must, no later than November 13, 2015, either file a proper joint discovery plan or show..
More
ORDER
(Docket No. 14)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 14. The discovery plan is hereby DENIED without prejudice. See Local Rule 26-1(d) (discovery plans must be submitted jointly). The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer, in compliance with the Court's Local Rules, with regard to the proposed discovery plan. The parties must, no later than November 13, 2015, either file a proper joint discovery plan or show cause in writing why they failed to timely file one.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
