PETRO-HUNT, L.L.C. v. U.S., 00-512L. (2013)
Court: United States Court of Federal Claims
Number: infdco20130812545
Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2013
Summary: ORDER FRANCIS M. ALLEGRA, Judge. On July 19, 2013, defendant filed a statement of expenses incurred in opposing plaintiff's renewed motion for a protective order. RCFC 37(a)(5)(B) requires plaintiff be given an opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, on or before September 9, 2013, plaintiff may file a brief regarding: 1. The reasonableness defendant's statement of expenses incurred; and 2. Whether its renewed motion for a protective order was substantially justified or other circumstances mak
Summary: ORDER FRANCIS M. ALLEGRA, Judge. On July 19, 2013, defendant filed a statement of expenses incurred in opposing plaintiff's renewed motion for a protective order. RCFC 37(a)(5)(B) requires plaintiff be given an opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, on or before September 9, 2013, plaintiff may file a brief regarding: 1. The reasonableness defendant's statement of expenses incurred; and 2. Whether its renewed motion for a protective order was substantially justified or other circumstances make..
More
ORDER
FRANCIS M. ALLEGRA, Judge.
On July 19, 2013, defendant filed a statement of expenses incurred in opposing plaintiff's renewed motion for a protective order. RCFC 37(a)(5)(B) requires plaintiff be given an opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, on or before September 9, 2013, plaintiff may file a brief regarding:
1. The reasonableness defendant's statement of expenses incurred; and
2. Whether its renewed motion for a protective order was substantially justified or other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
