United States v. Hylton, 2:17-cr-00086-HDM-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190813d29
Visitors: 25
Filed: Aug. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . Defendant Anthony Delano Hylton ("defendant") has filed a pro se motion to stay. (ECF No. 249). The government has moved to strike the motion because it was filed pro se by a defendant who is represented by counsel. (ECF No. 250). As defendant's motion to stay is a fugitive document filed in violation of Local Rule IA 11-6(a), the government's motion to strike (ECF No. 250) is GRANTED, and the motion to stay (ECF No. 249) is hereby STRICKEN fr
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . Defendant Anthony Delano Hylton ("defendant") has filed a pro se motion to stay. (ECF No. 249). The government has moved to strike the motion because it was filed pro se by a defendant who is represented by counsel. (ECF No. 250). As defendant's motion to stay is a fugitive document filed in violation of Local Rule IA 11-6(a), the government's motion to strike (ECF No. 250) is GRANTED, and the motion to stay (ECF No. 249) is hereby STRICKEN fro..
More
ORDER
HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge.
Defendant Anthony Delano Hylton ("defendant") has filed a pro se motion to stay. (ECF No. 249). The government has moved to strike the motion because it was filed pro se by a defendant who is represented by counsel. (ECF No. 250). As defendant's motion to stay is a fugitive document filed in violation of Local Rule IA 11-6(a), the government's motion to strike (ECF No. 250) is GRANTED, and the motion to stay (ECF No. 249) is hereby STRICKEN from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
