STATE v. VALDEZ, 35 (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20170315453
Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2017
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI , Chief Judge . {1} Defendant Manuel Valdez has sought to appe
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI , Chief Judge . {1} Defendant Manuel Valdez has sought to appea..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Chief Judge.
{1} Defendant Manuel Valdez has sought to appeal his conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. We previously issued a notice of proposed summary disposition in which we proposed to affirm. Defendant has filed a memorandum in opposition. After due consideration, we remain unpersuaded.
{2} In his memorandum in opposition, Defendant presents no new arguments but reiterates his position that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support his conviction. [MIO 2-5] We remain unpersuaded by Defendant's argument. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge and J. MILES HANISEE, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
