Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

USA v. Wiggins, 16-CR-4574 MCA. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20171212c18 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2017
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE WITHIN WHICH TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION KEVIN R. SWEAZEA , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the United States of America's unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to Defendant's motion, and the Court being otherwise fully apprised in the premises, finds that the motion is well taken and therefore, FINDS: 1. The United States' response to defendant's motion to suppress is currently due on December 11, 2017. 2. Counsel for th
More

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE WITHIN WHICH TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the United States of America's unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to Defendant's motion, and the Court being otherwise fully apprised in the premises, finds that the motion is well taken and therefore, FINDS:

1. The United States' response to defendant's motion to suppress is currently due on December 11, 2017.

2. Counsel for the United States advised the Court that counsel requires more time to thoroughly research the issues presented in the motion in order to draft an appropriate response. In addition, an amended motion to suppress may be filed by Counsel for the Defendant.

3. The needs of justice that would be served by granting the requested extension outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline to respond to Defendant's motion is extended to January 2, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer